A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Ricardo Castro Sandoval
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se ordenó no aplicar el Art. 1º numeral 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.
En consecuencia, se dirimió el conflicto suscitado, declarando que es el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Valle del Cauca el competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. No aplicar el articulo 1o, numeral 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
- SEGUNDO. Declarar que, de acuerdo con el conflicto planteado, el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Valle del Cauca es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
- TERCERO. Remitir, por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, el expediente al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Valle del Cauca, para lo de su competencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.